Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Scientologists who are actors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijou_Phillips
Excerpt:

Operation Recovery Promo Video

http://ivaw.org/blog/operation-recovery-promo-video


IVAW Operation Recovery: Stop the Deployment of Traumatized Troops
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV_jteN-B2I&noredirect=1  (see the person who pulled the children out of the van in Collateral Murder Video) ...cal :(

Collateral Murder Video on Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/05/wikileaks-exposes-video-o_n_525569.html
Excerpts:
1) Reporters working for WikiLeaks determined that the driver of the van was a good Samaritan on his way to take his small children to a tutoring session. He was killed and his two children were badly injured.
In the video, which Reuters has been asking to see since 2007, crew members can be heard celebrating their kills.
2)
Unveiling the video at the National Press Club on Monday morning, Assange said the helicopter crew approached its job as if it were a video game, not something involving human lives. Their desire was simply to kill," he said. "Their desire was to get high scores on that computer game."

Brad Manning is a Hero

Excerpt:
As the UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Ambeyi Ligabo, and the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, communicate to the US Mission, two Iraqi policemen in the Hay-al-Adil district of West Baghdad had been reported dead. The two were sent to go cover the scene. When they arrived, a US military sniper opened fire, fatally hitting Khaled once in the head and four times in the chest. Khadem was slightly wounded in the attack. US forces arrested and detained Khadem for three days claiming his story that a US sniper on a roof by a shopping center killed Khaled had “inconsistencies” that warranted “further questioning.”

Excerpt:

US troops 'crazy' in killing of cameraman

Journalists who were with a Reuters news cameraman shot dead by US troops while filming outside a Baghdad prison yesterday accused the soldiers of behaving in a "crazy" and negligent fashion.
They claimed the Americans had spotted the Reuters crew outside the jail half an hour before Mazen Dana was killed and must have realised he was not a guerrilla carrying a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.
The chief executive of Reuters, Tom Glocer, said: "The latest death is hard to bear. That's why I am calling upon the highest levels of the US government for a full and comprehensive investigation into this terrible tragedy."

http://www.oilempire.us/mediawar.html
Excerpt:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2003/08/276043.html
Secret US Mass Graves of Green Card Hopefuls.. a scoop in progress
KS, 25.08.2003 05:58
Did the Pentagon order the assassination of a journalist in order to cover up secret mass burials of dead U.S. soldiers and U.S.- contracted mercenaries in the deserts around Baghdad? What is really behind the killing of my colleague and friend, the Palestinian Reuters cameraman, Mazen Dana, in Bagdad?
Secret Burials in the Desert
Ultimate Disrespect for U.S. Army Personnel and US-Contracted Mercenaries in Iraq
Aug. 19, 2003
By Kawther Salam
The Daily Life of Kawther Salam

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Kilgallen
Excerpt:
 The circumstances of Kilgallen's death have been the subject of conjecture. Because the cause of her death was officially ruled as "undetermined,"[4] and because she openly criticized U.S. government agencies as far back as 1959, some believe that Kilgallen was actually murdered in order to silence her.[5] She was survived by her husband, both parents, a sister and her three children. They were and (those who are alive) are aware of the murder theory but none of them ever commented on it publicly.

http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/who-killed-dorothy-kilgallen-2
Excerpt:
Who killed the famed syndicated columnist and television personality?
A chemist reporting to Dr. Charles Umberger at the New York City Medical Examiner’s office discovered that reporter Dorothy Kilgallen had been murdered – and was ordered to keep the chemical analysis under wraps – in 1978.
The chemist ran an analysis of the glass Kilgallen had been drinking from when she died. The tests turned up traces of Nembutol on the glass. But Nembutol was not found in her blood. The blood tests turned up a lethal cocktail of drugs, three from the fastest-acting groups of barbituates: secobarbitol, amobarbital and pentobarbital.

http://www.copi.com/articles/probe/pr1197_jfk.html
Excerpt:
This is as specific as Capell gets in outlining his reason for the “conspiracy.” I wondered where he got the idea of Monroe’s “going public” about an affair. As many writers have pointed out, this would have been quite out of character for her. Something that Jim Marrs recently sent me may help explain it. He sent me the full text of a memo that he references in his current book, Alien Agenda. The memo supposedly reports on information gleaned from an FBI wiretap of Dorothy Kilgallen’s phone.

http://www.forteantimes.com/strangedays/conspiracycorner/5572/marilyn_and_mj12.html
Excerpt:
“Rothberg indicated in so many words, that she [Marilyn Monroe] had secrets to tell, no doubt arising from her trists [sic] with the President and the Attorney General. One such ‘secret’ mentions the visit by the President at a secret air base for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space. Kil­gallen replied that she knew what might be the source of visit. In the mid-fifties Kilgallen learned of secret effort by US and UK governments to identify the origins of crashed spacecraft and dead bodies, from a British government official. Kilgallen believed the story may have come from the New Mexico story in the late forties. Kilgallen said that if the story is true, it would cause terrible embarrassment for Jack and his plans to have NASA put men on the moon.”

Did JFK really talk about national security issues with Marilyn Monroe? This seems implausible to me, and one second-hand source, quoting Rothberg, says the document is a fake.[5] It hardly matters. If you look carefully at the fuzzy, often photocopied text,[6] right at the bottom on the left is what appears to be “MJ-12”. Yes, the “M” is indistinct, but the “J-12’ is quite legible. It’s another product of the Majestic disinformation mill!

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2011/09/marilyn-roswell/
Excerpt:
“Rothberg discussed the apparent comeback of [Marilyn Monroe] with Kilgallen and the break up with the Kennedy’s. Rothberg told Kilgallen that [Monroe] was attending Hollywood parties hosted by Hollywood’s elite and was becoming the talk of the town again. Rothberg indicated in so many words, that [Monroe] had secrets to tell, no doubt arising from her trysts with the President and the Attorney General.”
The document then gets to the point: “One such ‘secret’ mentioned the visit by the President at a secret air base for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space. Kilgallen replied that she knew what might be the source of the visit. In the mid-fifties Kilgallen learned of a secret effort by US and UK governments to identify the origins of crashed spacecraft and dead bodies, from a British Government official. Kilgallen believed the story may have come from the New Mexico area in the late forties. Kilgallen said that if the story is true, it would cause terrible embarrassment for Jack [Kennedy] and his plans to have NASA put me on the moon.”

Not sure what I think of the referencing of aliens in this video but I really like the rest... I have my own theory of aliens and this surely hits close.  I do hafta tell you tho that there has been some really strange goings on in the house lately and I cannot explain them.  A couple have been dreams and from past expceriences, I can't discount them???   ...cal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQJFHeugyE8

Jacqueline Kennedy Tapes, Recorded After JFK Assassination, Reveal Intimate Secrets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voDCp6-j1FI&feature=related

Lawyers Against War

http://ivaw.org/blog/lawyers-against-war-law
Excerpt:

Canada Must Arrest George W. Bush if he Enters Canada

by Gail Davidson, Lawyers Against War (LAW)

Vancouver, B.C. — An upcoming planned speaking engagement in Canada by former President George W. Bush is again generating a wave of protest.   Bush is reportedly scheduled to speak on October 20th at a gathering in Surrey, British Columbia hosted by Surrey Mayor Diane Watts. 
But Lawyers Against the War (LAW) says the Canadian government must either bar Bush at the border because of his alleged involvement in torture and other war crimes and crimes against humanity, or order his arrest when he enters Canada both to ensure he is prosecuted here or elsewhere, and to prevent him from returning to safe haven from prosecution in the United States.
In an August 25 letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Canadian Ministers of justice, immigration, public safety and foreign affairs, the group says “there is overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush …aided and abetted and counseled the torture of non-Americans at U.S. controlled prisons outside the U.S.”

___________________________________

L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 1
Thursday, August 25, 2011
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa ON K1A 0A2
Fax: 1 613 941 6900
Email:
pm@pm.gc.ca
The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1A 0H8
Fax: 1 613 954 0811
Email:
rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Jason Kenney,
Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism
325 East Block, House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
P. 613-992-2235
F. 613-992-1920
Email: Jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable Vic Toews,
Minister of Public Safety, House of Commons
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-992-3128
Fax: 613-995-1049
Email: vic.toews@parl.gc.ca
The Honourable John Baird, Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Lester B.Pearson Building, Tower A
125 Sussex Drive. Ottawa, ON, K1A 0G2
Telephone: 613-995-1851: Fax: 613-996-3443; 1 613 996 0984
Email:
john.baird@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Prime Minister and Ministers Nicholson, Kenney, Toews and Baird:
Re: Visit of George W. Bush on October 20, 2011: Canada must prevent entry or arrest and ensure
prosecution for torture.
George W. Bush is reported to be coming to Surrey British Columbia on October 20, 2011 at the
invitation of Surrey Mayor Diane Watts. There is overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush as
President of the United States of America (US) and Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces aided,
abetted and counseled the torture of non-Americans at US controlled prisons outside the US including but
not limited to Guantánamo Bay prison in Cuba, Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, Bagram prison in Afghanistan
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 2
other places. This letter of complaint focuses on torture allegations while acknowledging evidence of
other war crimes and crimes against humanity carried out by the Bush administration.
We are writing to report that:
Forces, is inadmissible to Canada under the
35(1)(a) because of overwhelming evidence that he has ‘committed, outside Canada, torture and other
offences referred to in sections 4 to 7 of the
George W. Bush, former President of the United States and Commander is Chief of the ArmedImmigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), sectionCrimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act
(CAHWC)
1; and,
violations, or a war crime or a crime against humanity within the meaning of subsections 6(3) to (5)
of the CAHWC.
We are writing to request that you act immediately to ensure that :
the George W. Bush Administration is known to have engaged in “systematic or gross human rights
George W. Bush is barred entry from Canada under the IRPA; or,
haven from prosecution for torture either in Canada or by returning the United States; and,
On entering Canada, George W. Bush is arrested to ensure that he will not receive safe
prosecuted in a jurisdiction willing and able to prosecute him for torture.
Canada initiates a prosecution for torture of George W. Bush or extradites him to be
We request that you also ensure that the RCMP War Crimes Section immediately takes the following
steps:
November 13, 2001 and November 2008 at Guantánamo Bay prison in Cuba, Abu Ghraib prison in
Iraq, Bagram prison in Afghanistan and other places; and,
begin an investigation of George W. Bush for aiding, abetting and counseling torture between
and other war crimes and crimes against humanity and therefore G.W. Bush, as former President, is
also inadmissible under section 35(1)(b) of the IRPA.
Canada has a legal duty to deny safe haven from prosecution to anyone suspected of torture, committed
anywhere against any persons. Under the
suspected of involvement in torture must be denied entry to Canada. Once a suspect enters the country,
Canada then has a legal obligation to ensure that suspect is prosecuted, if not in Canada, in a jurisdiction
willing and able to do so. Discharge of this duty usually would require the arrest and detention of the
suspect to prevent the suspect from escaping to a jurisdiction willing to provide safe haven from
prosecution. Given that US Attorney General has declared and demonstrated a refusal to prosecute Bush
for torture, if Bush is allowed entry, Canada’s initial duty would be first to prevent him returning to safe
haven in the U.S.
acknowledge that the George W. Bush administration is a “ government that has engaged in tortureImmigration and Refugee Protection Act (s. 35) anyone2 and then to ensure his prosecution either here or elsewhere.
1
against humanity include murder, enforced disappearance, deportation, imprisonment, torture and imprisonment or
other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law, committed against
any civilian population or any identifiable group. War crimes include willful killing, torture and inhuman treatment,
unlawful confinement and willfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of fair trial rights.
Under sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (S.C. 2000, chap. 24) crimes
2
administration officials.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has refused to consider torture investigations or prosecution of Bush
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 3
Canadian courts have recognized that the duty to deny safe haven from prosecution cannot be mitigated in
the case of grave and heinous crimes such as torture. Inadmissibility under the IRPA is established when
there are “reasonable grounds to believe” the foreign national—in this case George W. Bush--has
engaged in torture or other international crimes. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that reasonable
grounds are, “something more than suspicion but less than…proof on the balance of probabilities.”
torture is considered a grave and heinous crime, “the full application of s. 35 of the IRPA cannot be
mitigated.”
however brief, in Canada.
The law prohibits treating torture as legal—which Canadian authorities would have to do to either allow
Bush entry or on entry, to forbear from arresting and ensuring prosecution here or in another jurisdiction.
Canada’s legal duties to prevent and punish torture wherever, by whoever and against whomever
committed and to deny suspects safe haven from prosecution arise under a variety of binding instruments
including the:
torture and other Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
(GCs),
3 As4 There is therefore no discretion to provide Bush safe haven from prosecution during a stay,Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute), Convention against(CAT), Geneva ConventionsCrimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act (CAHWCA) and the Criminal Code of Canada
(Criminal Code). Canada’s jurisdiction to prosecute George W. Bush for torture is triggered if: George
W. Bush enters Canada; and/or, a victim of the alleged torture (Omar Khadr) is a Canadian citizen.
Evidence of Torture
Evidence of G.W. Bush’s complicity in torture is overwhelming. As stated by Maj. General Antonio M.
Taguba, author of the U.S. Army’s 2004 internal report on Abu Ghraib,
“… the Commander-in-Chief [Bush] and those under him authorized a systematic regime of
torture…. After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports
from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current [Bush]
administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is
whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.”
5
Many people aware of the evidence and the law have concluded that the available evidence establishes
conclusively that George W. Bush and other members of the Bush Administration committed torture (and
other war crimes and crimes against humanity) and therefore states now have a duty to condemn,
investigate, prosecute and punish those crimes. Following are a sample of conclusions and remarks by a
variety of such people. Comprehensive lists of evidence are readily available from a variety of sources
and will be provided on request.
In July 2004 the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded that the American military had used
interrogation techniques tantamount to torture on prisoners in Guantánamo Bay.
6
3
Mugesera v Canada, [2005] 2 S.C. R. 100 , para. 114
4
Varela v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] 1 FCR 605 at para. 44.
5
Torture by U.S. Personnel and its Impacts,
Maj. General Antonio M. Taguba (USA-Ret.), Preface to Broken Laws, Broken Lives: Medical Evidence ofA Report by Physicians for Human Rights, June 2008.
http://brokenlives.info/?page_id=69
6
Neil A. Lewis, Red Cross Finds Detainee Abuse in Guantánamo, New York Times, 30 Nov. 2004.
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 4
In a February 2006 report, a group of UN experts concluded that sleep deprivation for several consecutive
days, enforced isolation, the use of dogs, and exposure to extreme temperatures were all being used at
Guantánamo Bay prison by US officials and that these interrogation methods met all five elements of
torture (perpetrated by government official, had a clear purpose, committed intentionally, victims in a
position of powerlessness and caused severe physical or mental pain or suffering.)
7
In May 2006, the UN Committee on Torture called on the US to close Guantánamo Bay prison, to
eradicate the use of torture by military and civilian personnel and to rescind authority to use any
interrogation method that constitutes torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
8
In June 2007 the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly report by Senator Dick Marty concluded that
“the CIA [the US Central Intelligence Agency] committed a whole series of illegal acts in Europe
by abducting individuals, detaining them in secret locations and subjecting them to interrogation
techniques tantamount to torture.
9
In December 2008 the US Senate Armed Services Committee concluded,
“senior officials [Bush and others] in the United States government solicited information on how
to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and
authorized their use against detainees.”
10
In January 2009 Manfred Nowak, then the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture said,
“The evidence is sitting on the table…There is no avoiding the fact that this was torture… The
government of the United States is required to take all necessary steps to bring George W. Bush
and Donald Rumsfeld before a court.”
11
In February 2009, UN Special Rapporteur Martin Scheinin reached the same conclusion,
“…the United States has created a comprehensive system of extraordinary renditions, prolonged
and secret detention, and practices that violate the prohibition against torture and other forms of
ill-treatment….States must not aid or assist in the commission of acts of torture, or recognize
7
Arbitrary Detention, Leila Zerrougui; the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro
Despouy; the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,
Manfred Nowak; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Asma Jahangir; and the Special
Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental
health, Paul Hunt, E/CN.4/2006/120, 27 February 2006, at paras. 51 and 52.
Situation of detainees at Guantánamo Bay Report of the Chairperson-Rapporteur of the Working Group on
8
Doc. CAT/C/USA/CO/2 25 July 2006, paras 22, 24 and 26.
Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee against Torture: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
9
involving council of Europe member states: second report, CoE Doc. 11302 rev, 11 June 2007 at pp. 7 para. 9
Dick Marty, Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Secret detentions and illegal transfers of detainees
10
2008., Executive Summary, p. xii. http://armedservices.
senate.gov/Publications/Detainee%20Report%20Final_April%2022%202009.pdf
Senate Armed Services Committee Inquiry Into The Treatment Of Detainees In U.S. Custody, Dec. 11,
11
Magazine, 21 Jan. 2009.
Scott Horton, UN Rapporteur: Initiate criminal proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld now, Harpers
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 5
such practices as lawful, …Under international human rights law, States are under a positive
obligation to conduct independent investigations into alleged violations of the right to life,
freedom from torture or other inhuman treatment, enforced disappearances or arbitrary detention,
to bring to justice those responsible for such acts, and to provide reparations where they have
participated in such violations.”
On March 4 2009, then UN General Assembly President Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, on March 4, 2009
concluded,
"The [Bush Administration] aggressions against Iraq and Afghanistan and their occupations
constitute atrocities that must be condemned and repudiated by all who believe in the rule of law in
international relations,"
In May 2009 former Vice President Dick Cheney publicly stated that George W. Bush authorized the
use of torture,
“ I mean it was a presidential-level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed
off on it.”
12 (underlining added)13
In his 2010 memoirs, George W. Bush admitted to authorizing the use of interrogation techniques that
constitute torture such as water boarding.
14
In February 2011 Bush cancelled a trip
torture. Human Rights groups had called on the Swiss government to arrest him and open a criminal
investigation if he entered the country citing Switzerland’s legal obligations under CAT. The New Yorkbased
Center for Constitutional Rights and the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and
Human Rights, backed by many others—released and threatened to file a 45-page indictment backed up
by a 2,500 page summary of evidence of Bush’s role in authorizing, directing and supervising torture used
at U.S. controlled prison including Bagram Afghanistan, Abu Ghraib, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay Cuba.
15 to Switzerland because he faced the risk of prosecution for16
Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch commented, “I'm surprised he (Bush) would even consider visiting a
country that has ratified the torture convention and which takes its responsibilities seriously."
17
In June 2011 Human Rights Watch published an extensive report concluding that members of the Bush
administration had used torture and should be prosecuted.
18
12
while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin, A/HRC/10/3,4 February 2009.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms
13
dick-cheney-on-face-the-nation-10-may.html
10 May 2009 CBS, Face the Nation. http://www.enduringamerica.com/may-2009/2009/5/9/video-andtranscript-
14
Decision Points, Crown Publishing Group 2010, p. 169-71.
15
Bush was reported to be coming to Geneva to speak at the Keren Hayesod's annual dinner on Feb. 12, 2011.
16
Preliminary Indictment for Torture: George W. Bush Brought Pursuant to the Convention Against Torture;
http://ccrjustice.org/files/FINAL%207%20Feb%20BUSH%20INDICTMENT.pdf
17
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/05/us-bush-torture-idUSTRE7141CU20110205
Stephanie Nebehay, Bush's Swiss visit off after complaints on torture, Reuters, 5 February 2011.
18
Getting Away with Torture: The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees, Human Rights Watch,
June 2011
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 6
Duty to prosecute
The duty to prosecute George W. Bush for torture (and other war crimes and crimes against humanity)
once he is in Canada, arises from many sources including:
Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act
(CAHWCA),
Statute) and
Punishment
over those responsible for international crimes.” CAT, specifically requires Canada to either prosecute or
extradite for prosecution any person within Canadian territory, alleged to have committed torture. (Art. 7)
Under CAT, Art. 12, Canada has an urgent duty to investigate allegations of torture and of other cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment as part of its duty to prevent such crimes. The CAT Committee has ruled
that delay by a state to investigate allegations of torture
violation of CAT.
administration is imperative. It became so in March 2004 when Canada received notice that the US had
subjected Omar Khadr to prolonged sleep deprivation and isolation to prepare him for questioning by
Canadian officials. The Federal Court confirmed earlier findings of UN experts that this practice was,
“…a breach of international human rights law respecting the treatment of detainees under UNCAT and the
1949 Geneva Conventions.”
Canada.
Under Article 1 of all Geneva Conventions (GCs), Canada has an obligation to respect and to ensure
respect for the Conventions “in all circumstances.” Torture and inhuman treatment are grave breaches of
the GCs. Having knowledge of grave breaches, Canada is legally required to,
“…search for persons alleged to have committed, or to have ordered to be committed, such grave
breaches, and shall bring such persons, regardless of their nationality, before its own courts. It
may also, if it prefers, and in accordance with the provisions of its own legislation, hand such
persons over for trial to another High Contracting Party concerned, provided such High
Contracting Party has made out a prima facie case.” (GC III Art. 130; GC IV Art. 146 ;.)
Canada has enacted the jurisdiction to prosecute torture and other grave breaches of the GCs as defined
by the Rome Statute, wherever those crimes occur when the victim is a Canadian citizen (Omar Khadr)
and/or the suspect (George W. Bush) is in Canada. The
establishes jurisdiction to prosecute torture committed outside Canada in these circumstances.
Criminal Code of Canada, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (RomeConvention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or(CAT). The Rome Statute, obliges Canada generally to, “…exercise its criminal jurisdictionor inhumane or degrading treatment is itself a19 Canada’s duty to investigate torture by George W. Bush and other officials of the Bush20 The duty to prosecute becomes imperative when George W. Bush entersCriminal Code of Canada (CC) s. 269.1 & 7(3.7)21 The
Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act
torture a crime and establish Canada’s jurisdiction to prosecute foreign nationals when the victim is a
Canadian citizen and/or when the suspect enters Canada.
(CAHWCA) and the Geneva Conventions Act also make
19
Abad v. Spain
See Halimi-Nedzibi v. Australia in which a 15-month delay was adjudged a breach of Article 12 and Blancowhere a delay of 32 days was held by the CAT Committee to be a breach of CAT Article 12.
20
175 C.R.R. (2d) 345.
Khadr v. Canada (Attorney General), 2008 FC 807 (CanLII), June 25, 2008, at para. 88. 59 C.R. (6th) 284 •
21
(3) & 8(a) (iii),
Criminal Code of Canada, ss. 269, 7(3.7); Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act, (2000, c.24) ss. 6(1)Geneva Conventions Act, R.S. 1985 c. G-3.
L
AWY E R S AGA IN S T THE WA R
Canada 1 604 738 0338
law@portal.ca
www. lawy e r sag a ins t thewa r .o rg
George W. Bush: Canada must bar entry or arrest and ensure prosecution for torture 7
The evidence of torture by the Bush administration and the evidence of Bush’s involvement in aiding
abetting and counseling torture while President of the United States and the Commander in Chief of the
US Armed Forces coupled with the law imposes a mandatory duty on Canada to:
1. Prevent George W. Bush from entering Canada; or,
2. If George W. Bush enters Canada, to prevent him receiving safe haven from torture in
Canada or by returning to the US; and,
3. Ensure that George W. Bush is prosecuted for torture in accordance with law in Canada or
extradited to a jurisdiction willing and able to prosecute him for torture.
Respectfully submitted,
Gail Davidson, Lawyers against the War Professor Francis A. Boyle
University of Illinois College of Law USA
Board of Directors, Amnesty International USA
(1988-92)
Law Building, 504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
Tel: 217-333-7954 ; Fax: 217-244-1478 (fax)
Copies to:
Nycole Turmel, interim Leader of the New Democratic Party,
nycole.turmel@parl.gc.ca
Joe Comartin MP, NDP Justice Critic, joe.comartin@parl.gc.ca
Don Davies MP, NDP Citizenship, Immigration critic, dondavies.ndp.ca
Paul Dewar MP, NDP Foreign Affairs Critic, paul.dewar@parl.gc.ca
Jasbir Sandhu MP, NDP Public Safety Critic, jasbir.sandhu@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Rob Rae, MP, Interim Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada,
rae.b@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Irwin Cotler MP, Liberal Justice Critic, irwin.cotler@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Francis Scarpaleggia MP, Liberal Public Safety Critic, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Kevin Lamoureux MP, Liberal Immigration Critic, Kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Dominic LeBlanc MP, Liberal Foreign Affairs Critic, dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca
Ms. Elizabeth May MP, Leader of the Green Party of Canada,
leader@greenparty.ca
Jean Francois Fortin MP, Bloq Quebecois Foreign Affairs Critic, jean-francois.fortin@parl.gc.ca
André Bellavance MP, Bloq Quebecois Citizenship and Immigration Critic, andre.bellavance@parl.gc.ca
Maria Mourani MP, Bloq Quebecois Justice and Public Safety Critic, maria.mourani@parl.gc.ca
Mr. Juan Méndez, UN Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment,
sr-torture@ohchr.org
Mr. Alex Neve, Amnesty International Canada, aneve@amnesty.ca
Mayor Diane Watts of Surrey BC Fax: 604-591-5175 mayor@surrey.ca
RCMP Commissioner William J.S. Elliott,
William.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
RCMP Superintendent Lloyd Plante, lloyde.plante@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

WI No right to produce or eat food/All righty then, let's jump into our baths fully clothed?

http://nonais.org/2011/09/27/wi-no-right-to-produce-or-eat-food/
Excerpt:

September 27, 2011

WI: No Right to Produce or Eat Food

Alert - National, Action Item — walterj 9:29 am
In scary legal news a Wisconsin judge had gone completely loopy declaring that citizens have no right to produce or eat the foods of their own choice.
In response to a request from the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, the judge issued a clarification of his decision last week regarding his assessment of the constitutionality of food rights. The judge expanded on his original statement that such constitutional issues are “wholly without merit.”
He explained that the FTCLDF arguments were “extremely underdeveloped.” As an example, he said the plaintiffs’ use of the Roe v Wade abortion rights case as a precedent does “not explain why a woman’s right to have an abortion translates to a right to consume unpasteurized milk…This court is unwilling to declare that there is a fundamental right to consume the food of one’s choice without first being presented with significantly more developed arguments on both sides of the issue.” Gee, I thought they both had to do with the right to decide what to do with your own body.
As if to show how pissed he was at being questioned, he said his decision translates further that “no, Plaintiffs to not have a fundamental right to own and use a dairy cow or a dairy herd;
“no, Plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to consume the milk from their own cow;”
And in a kind of exclamation point, he added this to his list of no-nos: “no, Plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to produce and consume the foods of their choice…”

http://www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=3135
Excerpt:

In Colorado, Rain Barrels Are Illegal. Yup.

Please, slowly step away from the rain drops...

143 Comments

Yesterday, after I vented a bit on the lack of rain barrel options at Big Box stores, a reader tipped us off to a very interesting issue in her state of Colorado. Rain barrels there, you see, are outlawed. Colorado state law mandates that any water falling from the air is not yours. In fact, according to their site, its already been “legally allocated” — so, you don’t actually have any rights when it comes to using precipitation that falls on your property. Here’s the exact wording:
Colorado Water Law requires that precipitation fall to the ground, run off and into the river of the watershed where it fell. Because rights to water are legally allocated in this state, an individual may not capture and use water to which he/she does not have a right. We must remember also that rain barrels don’t help much in a drought because a drought by its very nature supplies little in the way of snow or rain.
Additionally, any and all water that comes from tap may only be used once. “Denver water customers are not permitted to take their bath or laundry water (commonly referred to as gray water) and dump it on their outdoor plants or garden.” Even if that said water is ecologically-friendly?
We’re not alone in thinking this is a stupid law. Last summer, The Colorado Springs Gazette said the following:
“The rain barrel is the bong of the Colorado garden. It’s legal to sell one. It’s legal to own one. It’s just not legal to use it for its intended purpose. Meanwhile, when rain does fall, the torrential flood caused by water running off a few thousand acres of roofs, roads and parking lots erodes downstream ranches, undercuts city sewer pipes and really makes Pueblo mad.
It’s gotten so bad that the city is taxing us all — excuse me, feeing us all — to pay for $295 million in stormwater projects. So wouldn’t it make sense to save a little rain when it falls, keep it from barreling down Fountain Creek, and use it when needed? Of course it would.”

http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/06702.html
Excerpt:

Graywater Reuse and Rainwater Harvesting

by R. Waskom and J. Kallenberger1 (7/09)

Quick Facts...

  • Graywater reuse may not be a permissible use of water under a domestic well permit or a community water supply system.
  • Rainwater harvesting is the process of intercepting storm-water runoff and putting it to beneficial use.
  • In most areas of Colorado, the most common way to use rainwater is to direct roof gutter downspouts to landscape areas you wish to water.
  • Recent legislation allows limited collection and use of precipitation from residential property rooftops in cases where the landowner uses or is entitled to only certain types of well permits to use well water for their domestic non-potable water supply.

Graywater Systems

Graywater refers to the reuse of water drained from baths, showers, washing machines, and sinks (household wastewater excluding toilet wastes) for irrigation and other water conservation applications. Contrary to common belief, graywater is not a safe product—it contains bacteria and other potential pathogens. Consequently, the potential reuse of graywater is a public health issue, not a water conservation priority.
Graywater is of lesser quality than tap water, but generally of higher quality than blackwater, or water from sewage systems. Water from the kitchen sink, garbage disposal and dishwasher is considered blackwater in other states because of high concentrations of organic waste and the difficulties of reusing this water safely.
The most obvious advantage of domestic graywater use is that it may potentially replace other water used for landscape irrigation, although many interests are now advocating the use of gray water for toilet flushing. Filtered graywater is most suitably used for subsurface irrigation of nonedible landscape plants. Not only does its use on landscapes conserve treated tap water, but graywater may also benefit plants because it often contains nutrients such as nitrogen or phosphorus.
Graywater use may offer financial savings to already overburdened municipal sewage treatment facilities because graywater use diminishes sewer flows, thereby lessening the need to expand such facilities. However, diminished sewer flows may have a downside because graywater use can result in insufficient sewer flows to carry waste to the sewer plant. Another concern is that with increased use of graywater, less effluent water will be available for treatment, resulting in less reclaimed water for municipal uses and downstream appropriators. Herein lies the source of the potential water rights concerns associated with graywater reuse.
Graywater systems vary from simple, low-cost systems to highly complex and costly systems. A common (but illegal in Colorado and most other states) method for reusing graywater is to drain the washing machine directly onto outside vegetation. Sophisticated systems treat graywater prior to disposal using settling tanks and sand filters in order to remove solids and pathogens. (Note: settling tanks and filters will not remove pollutants that are dissolved.)

Water Quality Issues Surrounding Graywater Reuse in Colorado

Practically speaking, the use of graywater systems is not viable for most homeowners in Colorado. Currently graywater is regulated under the State of Colorado Guidelines on Individual Sewage Disposal Systems and applicable county Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) does not currently separate graywater from blackwater in its regulations. Consequently, both surface and subsurface applications require permitting and may trigger monitoring requirements.

WI No right to produce or eat food

http://nonais.org/2011/09/27/wi-no-right-to-produce-or-eat-food/
Excerpt:

Videos Occupy Wall Street/Anonymous video, pepper spray video

PEACEFUL FEMALE PROTESTORS PENNED IN THE STREET AND MACED!- #OccupyWallStreet  (where is Joe Biden when you need him?)  ...cal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moD2JnGTToA&feature=player_embedded

Anonymous Occupy Wall Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6jdkpQjueo

Luke Rudkowski on RT: Wall Street protests head west

http://www.wearechange.org/?p=9806

ANONYMOUS on Russsia Today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyhCtbAuHbk

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/markets/80-arrested-as-occupy-wall-street-protest-of-bank-bailouts-mortgage-crisis-marches-in-nyc/2011/09/24/gIQACCKWuK_story.html
Excerpt:
Occupy Wall Street Protest of bank bailouts mortgage crisis marches in NYC

Stevie Nicks on The View

http://www.cbs.com/daytime/the_talk/video/?pid=ANPz_jebR_HmlbS8rspoPlg8dwLdFsWx&vs=Default&play=true

Pete Seeger: Where Have All the Flowers Gone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y2SIIeqy34
Excerpt:
On July 26, 1956, the House of Representatives voted 373 to 9 to cite Pete Seeger and seven others (including playwright Arthur Miller) for contempt, as they failed to cooperate with House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in their attempts to investigate alleged subversives and communists. Pete Seeger testified before the HUAC in 1955.
In one of Pete's darkest moments, when his personal freedom, his career, and his safety were in jeopardy, a flash of inspiration ignited this song. The song was stirred by a passage from Mikhail Sholokhov's novel "And Quie Flows the Don". Around the world the song traveled and in 1962 at a UNICEF concert in Germany, Marlene Dietrich, Academy Award-nominated German-born American actress, first performed the song in French, as "Qui peut dire ou vont les fleurs?" Shortly after she sang it in German. The song's impact in Germany just after WWII was shattering. It's universal message, "let there be peace in the world" did not get lost in its translation. To the contrary, the combination of the language, the setting, and the great lyrics has had a profound effect on people all around the world. May it have the same effect today and bring renewed awareness to all that hear it.

Where Have all the Flowers Gone: Eve of Destruction
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QslV5asj_yM&feature=fvwrel

Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth -Smother Bros show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm6NeM-6vBE

For What Its Worth - Stephen Stills (Live)
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y16iDqQiVg&feature=related

John Lennon - Give Peace A Chance (Original Video Tape) [HiQ] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwNg4lHFj7I&feature=related
Excerpt:
Lennon played acoustic guitar and was joined by Tommy Smothers of the Smothers Brothers, also on acoustic guitar.


For What It's Worth Stevie Nicks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mO4VNvIx-rM  Responding to the song right before this one.......  I used to watch the Smothers Brothers and they were a big part of the movement back in the day.  ...cal

https://market.android.com/details?id=book--aS_vD_lYwEC
Excerpt:
A behind-the-scenes look at the rise and fall of The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour -- the provocative, politically charged program that shocked the censors, outraged the White House, and forever changed the face of television. Decades before The Daily Show, The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour proved there was a place on television for no-holds-barred political comedy with a decidedly antiauthoritarian point of view. In this explosive, revealing history of the show, veteran entertainment journalist David Bianculli tells the fascinating story of its three-year network run -- and the cultural impact that's still being felt today.
Before it was suddenly removed from the CBS lineup (reportedly under pressure from the Nixon administration), The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour was a ratings powerhouse. It helped launch the careers of comedy legends such as Steve Martin and Rob Reiner, featured groundbreaking musical acts like the Beatles and the Who, and served as a cultural touchstone for the antiwar movement of the late 1960s.
Drawing on extensive original interviews with Tom and Dick Smothers and dozens of other key players -- as well as more than a decade's worth of original research -- Dangerously Funny brings readers behind the scenes for all the battles over censorship, mind-blowing musical performances, and unforgettable sketches that defined the show and its era.
David Bianculli delves deep into this riveting story, to find out what really happened and to reveal why this show remains so significant to this day.

Leather and Lace Stevie Nicks and Don Henley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSpM2YEE2E0&feature=related

Secret Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTka849zFfE&feature=related

In Your Dreams
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdaJqynA8Y0&feature=related

Landslide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5N39KTc0kk&feature=related

New Orleans
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyV02pvj1Cg&feature=related

http://www.angelfire.com/ny2/cherylw/page63.html
Excerpt:
NAME: Christian Gene Gaines
BORN: August 10, 1967, Brisbane, Australia
FATHER: Gene Gaines - former Swim Coach for Long
Beach State University & former Coach of
both the US and Australian Olympic Swim
Teams
MOTHER: Carolyn Johnns-Gaines - former swimmer for
the Australian Olympic Team and
Commonwealth Games medalist
Chris was born August 10, 1967 in Brisbane, Australia. His family moved to the Los Angeles area when he was 5 yrs. old. As an only child, Chris was expected by many to carry the torch in the Olympic waters. The young Gaines, however, defied expectations of an athletic future and developed a life-long passion for music, a passion so great, Chris decided to quit school his senior year at Morningside High to pursue his music professionally(although he did complete his GED in 1987).
Chris joined his best friend Tommy Levitz along with Marc Obed in the band, Crush. The band signed with Capitol Records in 1985 and released their self titled debut album in 1986. The second single, "My Love Tells Me So", was a smash and one of the year's most successful songs. But the band's success was short-lived when lead singer Tommy Levitz died in a plane crash later that year.
For the next two years, Joe Smith of Capitol Records and Chris discussed the possibility of a Chris Gaines solo career and in 1989, Chris debuted his solo album, "Straight Jacket". Both the public and the music industry responded favorably; the album spent an extraordinary 224 weeks on the Billboard Top 200 Albums Chart and won the Grammy Award for the Album of the Year. The album, which featured the hits "Maybe", "White Flag" and "Digging for Gold", is still Chris' biggest selling album to date.
Tragedy struck again when Chris' father died in the fall of 1990 after his long battle with cancer. Almost a year to the day later, Chris released his second solo album, "Fornucopia". Even though it was a very dark and angry album, it debuted at #1 and spent a combined 18 weeks on the top of the Billboard Top 200 Albums Chart. The album included the soulful remake of the 1972 Ramsey Sellers classic, "It Don't Matter to the Sun", and the instant classic, "Main Street".
In the winter of 1992, Chris was involved in a violent single-car crash that nearly ended his life. Chris spent 6 weeks in the hospital and over two years undergoing extensive plastic surgery on his face, shoulder and hands. Although he would not allow himself to be seen or photographed, Chris released his third solo album, "Apostle", in the winter of 1994. Without any artist promotion, the album still managed to spend a combined 8 weeks atop the Billboard Top 200 Albums Chart, and featured the singles "Way of the Girl" and "Unsigned Letter".
Finally, in the winter of 1996, Chris re-emerged into public view for the first time with "Triangle". Chris was dubbed "The New Prince" by the media because of his new look and the fact that his music showed a move towards R&B, a distinct change in musical style from his past. "Driftin' Away", "That's the Way I Remember It", and "Snow in July" are the featured hits on the album.
NOW......on the eve of the millenium...Chris has assembled his greatest hits, as well as two new songs, "Lost in You" and "Right Now". Chris' "Greatest Hits", aka "In The Life of Chris Gaines" is the perfect bridge between his upcoming solo album, "The Lamb", (which the critics already predict will be the definitive album of the new millenium")and the albums that have defined our times over the last decade.
Get the real scoop on Chris, direct from his record label---->Click Here!!
Garth Reviews "The Lamb" and "Chris Gaines"
Home